How to use critical discourse analysis for policy analysis: a guideline for policymakers and other professionals
Keywords:
KMAbstract
This tool aims to explain how critical discourse analysis (CDA) can be used to analyse policy texts, based on the example of ways in which we have employed CDA in recent academic papers. In these papers, using CDA has represented a process of learning by doing and we have tried to distil this process for others. We have adapted the methodology developed by Fairclough, making it more accessible for a non-specialist audience by improving the clarity of the language and describing the four phases of the methodology in more detail.
References
References
Brandner, A. and S. Cummings (2018) Agenda Knowledge for Development: strengthening Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals. Vienna: Knowledge for Development Partnership, 99pp.
Briant Carant, J. (2016): Unheard voices: a critical discourse analysis of the Millennium Development Goals? evolution into the Sustainable Development Goals. Third World Quarterly, DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1166944
Cummings, S.J.R., Regeer, B.J., de Haan, L.J.A., Zweekhorst, M.B.M. and Bunders, J.F.G. (2018) Critical discourse analysis of perspectives on knowledge and knowledge societies within the Sustainable Development Goals. Development Policy Review 36: 727-747.
Cummings, S.J.R., A.A. Seferiadis and L. de Haan (2019) Getting down to business? Critical discourse analysis of perspectives on the private sector in sustainable development. Sustainable Development Online first https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2026
van Dijk, T. A. (2005) Critical Discourse Analysis, in The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (eds D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. E. Hamilton), Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Malden, Massachusetts, USA. doi: 10.1002/9780470753460.ch19
Fairclough, N. (2005) Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. In: A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Edited by Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 13] 2005, 53-70 https://www.sfu.ca/cmns/courses/2012/801/1-Readings/Fairclough_CDA%20and%20interdisciplinary%20research.pdf (Accessed 19 June 2016)
Fairclough, N. (1995) Media discourse. London: Hodder Headline Group, 1995.
Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and Globalization. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203593769
Fairclough. N. (2012a) The dialectics of discourse. Unpublished paper
https://www.sfu.ca/cmns/courses/2012/801/1-readings/Fairclough%20Dialectics%20of%20Discourse%20Analysis.pdf (Accessed 11 May 2016)
Fairclough, Norman (2012b) Critical Discourse Analysis. In: The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by James Paul Gee and Michael Handford, 9-21. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2012.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Abingdon: Routledge.
Freeman, R., & Maybin, J. (2011). Documents, Practices and Policy. Evidence & Policy, 7(2), 155-170. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/documents-practices-and-policy(88450712-b952-437a-92df-c1de61136f72).html (Accessed on 17 July 2019).
Hook, D. (2001). Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history : Foucault and discourse analysis. London: LSE Research Online. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/956
Hornidge, A.K. (2011) ?Knowledge Society? as academic concept and stage of development: a conceptual and historical review. In: Menkhoff, Thomas, Hans-Dieter Evers, Chay Yue Wah and Eng Fong Pang (eds.) Beyond the Knowledge Trap. New Jersey: World Scientific, pp. 87-128.
Jarvis, L. (2009). Times of terror : Discourse, temporality and the war on terror. Basingstoke England: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230243637
Langan, M. (2011) Private sector development as poverty and strategic discourse. Journal of Modern African Studies, 49: 83-113
Parker, I. (1990) Discourse: definitions and contradictions. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3): 187-204.
Potter, J. and M. Wetherell (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: beyond attitudes and
behaviour (London, Sage).
Said, E. (1983). The world, the text and the critic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Spangenberg, J.H. (2017) Hot air or comprehensive progress? A critical assessment of the SDGs. Sustainable Development 25: 311?321.
Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication (Accessed 15 January 2019)
United Nations Millennium Declaration. New York: UN General Assembly.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Sarah Cummings, Leah De Haan, Anastasia-Alithia Seferiadis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in this journal remains the property of the authors. For liability reasons, the title belongs to the Foundation for the Support of the Knowledge Management for Development Journal. The journal is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License. This journal is currently an open access journal as it has a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition [1] of "open access", we support the rights of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles." However, some of the content (2009-2012) is only available on the Taylor and Francis website. Within the next few months, this issue too will become available on the OJS. [1] http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess