Beyond the conventional boundaries of knowledge management: navigating the emergent pathways of learning and innovation for international development
Keywords:
knowledge management, emergence, innovation, development studies, international development, developing countries, Africa
References
Ferguson, J., Mchombu, K., and Cummings, S., 2007. Meta-review and scoping study of the management of knowledge for development. IKM Working Paper No. 1, March 2008.
Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, A., Bockett, G., Taylor, S., Sivamohan, M. V. K., and Clark, N., 2001. Why research partnerships really matter: innovation theory, institutional arrangements and implications for developing new technology for the poor. World Development, 29(5), 783–797.
Hekkert, M.P., Suurs, R.A.A., Negro, S.O., Kuhlmann, S., and Smits, R.E.H.M., 2007. Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 74 (4), 413–432.
Howells, J., 2006. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728.
Klerkx, L., Hall, A., and Leeuwis, C., 2009. Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 8 (5/6), 409–438.
Kraemer-Mbula, E. and Wamae, W., 2010. Innovation and the Development Agenda. OECD/IDRC, Paris/Ottowa.
Lambe, P. 2007. Organising information: taxonomies, knowledge and organisational effectiveness. Oxford: Chandos.
Leeuwis, C., 2000. Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: towards a negotiation approach. Development and Change, 31 (5):931–959.
Lundvall, B. Å., Joseph, K.J., Chaminade, C., and Vang, J., 2009. Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar.
Pant, L.P. and Hambly-Odame, H., 2006. Multi-stakeholder deliberation on dialectical divides: an operational principle of the Systems of Innovation. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 2, 60–74.
Röling, N. 2009., Pathways for impact: scientists’ different perspectives on agricultural innovation. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 7 (2), 83–94.
Smits, R. 2002., Innovation studies in the 21st century: questions from a user’s perspective, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69 (9), 861–883.
Kalseth, K. and Cummings, S., 2001. Knowledge management: development strategy or business strategy? Information Development, 17, 163–171.
Ferguson, J. and Cummings, S., 2005. Like a duck to water: the KM4D journal. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 1 (1), 3–5. Available from: http://journal.km4dev.org/
index.php/km4dj/article/viewFile/4/1 [Accessed February 2011].
Scope note for new journal proposal, 2005. Knowledge Management for Development Journal (KM4DJ). Unpublished paper, 2pp.
Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, A., Bockett, G., Taylor, S., Sivamohan, M. V. K., and Clark, N., 2001. Why research partnerships really matter: innovation theory, institutional arrangements and implications for developing new technology for the poor. World Development, 29(5), 783–797.
Hekkert, M.P., Suurs, R.A.A., Negro, S.O., Kuhlmann, S., and Smits, R.E.H.M., 2007. Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 74 (4), 413–432.
Howells, J., 2006. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728.
Klerkx, L., Hall, A., and Leeuwis, C., 2009. Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 8 (5/6), 409–438.
Kraemer-Mbula, E. and Wamae, W., 2010. Innovation and the Development Agenda. OECD/IDRC, Paris/Ottowa.
Lambe, P. 2007. Organising information: taxonomies, knowledge and organisational effectiveness. Oxford: Chandos.
Leeuwis, C., 2000. Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: towards a negotiation approach. Development and Change, 31 (5):931–959.
Lundvall, B. Å., Joseph, K.J., Chaminade, C., and Vang, J., 2009. Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar.
Pant, L.P. and Hambly-Odame, H., 2006. Multi-stakeholder deliberation on dialectical divides: an operational principle of the Systems of Innovation. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 2, 60–74.
Röling, N. 2009., Pathways for impact: scientists’ different perspectives on agricultural innovation. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 7 (2), 83–94.
Smits, R. 2002., Innovation studies in the 21st century: questions from a user’s perspective, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69 (9), 861–883.
Kalseth, K. and Cummings, S., 2001. Knowledge management: development strategy or business strategy? Information Development, 17, 163–171.
Ferguson, J. and Cummings, S., 2005. Like a duck to water: the KM4D journal. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 1 (1), 3–5. Available from: http://journal.km4dev.org/
index.php/km4dj/article/viewFile/4/1 [Accessed February 2011].
Scope note for new journal proposal, 2005. Knowledge Management for Development Journal (KM4DJ). Unpublished paper, 2pp.
Published
2019-08-17
Section
Editorial
Copyright (c) 2019 Laurens Klerkx, Laxmi Prasad Pant, Cees Leeuwis; Sarah Cummings; Ewen Le Borgne, Denise Senmartin, Lucie Lamoureux, Ivan Kulis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in this journal remains the property of the authors. For liability reasons, the title belongs to the Foundation for the Support of the Knowledge Management for Development Journal. The journal is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License. This journal is currently an open access journal as it has a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition [1] of "open access", we support the rights of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles." However, some of the content (2009-2012) is only available on the Taylor and Francis website. Within the next few months, this issue too will become available on the OJS. [1] http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess
