Evaluation and communication mentoring for capacity development: a hybrid decision-making framework
Keywords:decision-making framework, mentoring, capacity development, utilization-focused evaluation, research communication, theory of change.
AbstractWe report on a decision-making framework that enables projects and programs to take ownership of their evaluation and communication plans. The framework is a blend of utilization-focused evaluation (UFE) and research communication supported by mentoring. This combination we have found has resulted in the development of a hybrid tool that also helps project teams clarify and update their Theories of Change. This result is significant as most of the partners have been information society research projects that are complex and dynamic. The approach has been delivered as a capacity development effort with attention to partner’s readiness to received mentoring. The partners have produced evaluation plans and research communication strategies that they own and utilize. This approach grew out of two IDRC-funded capacity development research projects (DECI-1 and 2) that provided mentoring in evaluation and communication for information society research teams globally, between 2009 and 2017. The mentoring progress was tracked through debriefing and process documentation with some use of checklists. Case studies were produced to summarize the process and outcomes. While the project began with a focus on evaluation and communication, the resulting hybrid framework has wider knowledge management potential by enhancing reflective learning throughout the evolution of a project.
The copyright of the articles published in this journal remains the property of the authors. For liability reasons, the title belongs to the Foundation for the Support of the Knowledge Management for Development Journal. The journal is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License. This journal is currently an open access journal as it has a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition  of "open access", we support the rights of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles." However, some of the content (2009-2012) is only available on the Taylor and Francis website. Within the next few months, this issue too will become available on the OJS.  http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess