Confluence of knowledge: cyclical steps for transdisciplinary research in practice, Brazil
Keywords:
Transdisciplinarity, Participatory action research, Emotions, Transformative, MethodologiesAbstract
Transdisciplinarity has been widely emphasized as an alternative approach for mitigating the social-environmental crises, and it is motivated by the limitations of compartmentalized disciplinary research. Transdisciplinarity is also a methodological process of learning and co-production, but its success requires attention to the complexity of human relationships, such as diverse values, interests, and tensions. This article aims to share insights from a transdisciplinary process co-developed with a fishing community and an academic research team in Brazil. It discusses steps for taking transdisciplinary research into practice, while also offering critical perspectives. By reflecting on these steps, I hope to assist research involving various stakeholders in better understanding the responsibilities and practical demands involved in converging different knowledge(s). By offering new avenues for addressing the problems of our interconnected world, the article asks for creativity and engagement to understand and develop practices of confluence of knowledge. This article does not aim to bring a recipe or a rigid structure to transdisciplinarity, but it is an invitation to think about how (or if) we are doing transdisciplinary science in a transformative way. Are we just reproducing the dominant pattern of science or creating novel pathways?
References
Bahia, Governo do estado da Bahia (2003) Diagnóstico socioeconômico e ambiental do Conde, Projeto de gerenciamento costeiro ‘gestão integrada da orla marítima no município do Conde no estado da Bahia.’ Secretaria do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos (SEMARH), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Bammer, G., O’Rourke, M., O’Connell, D. et al. (2020) Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened? Palgrave Communications 6, 5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0380-0
Bispo dos Santos, Antônio. (2023). A terra dá, a terra quer. Ubu editora/PISEGRAMA. 1aed.
Bispo dos Santos, Antônio. Interview: ‘Nêgo Bispo: vida, memória e aprendizado quilombola.’ Itaú Cultural: 15 March 2021. Available in: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLo9ZNdgJxw>. Accessed in: 2 April 2024
Booker, F. & Franks, P. (2019) Governance Assessment for Protected and Conserved Areas (GAPA). Methodology manual for GAPA facilitators. IIED, London.
Brinkmann, S. (2014). Unstructured and semi-structured interviewing. Oxford handbook of qualitative research, 2, 277-299.
Chambers, R. & Guijt, I. (1995) DRP: después de cinco años, ¿donde nos encontramos? Revista Bosques, Arboles y Comunidades Rurales. Quito: FAO, n. 26, p. 4-14.
Chilisa, B. (2019). Indigenous research methodologies. Sage publications.
Cooke, B and Kothari, U (2006) Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books, pp. 153–167.
De La Rosa, G., Muñiz, E. M., El-Hani, C. N., & Ludwig, D. (2024). Navigating between Promises and Realities of Transdisciplinary Research for Environmental Conservation. Human Ecology 52, 697–708 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-024-00520-6
Dupuis, C., Harcourt, W., Gaybor, J., & van den Berg, K. (2022). Introduction: Feminism as Method: Navigating Theory and Practice. In: W. Harcourt, K. van den Berg, C. Dupuis, & J. Gaybor (Eds.), Feminist Methodologies: Experiments, Collaborations and Reflections (pp. 1–20). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82654-3_1
Gonzalez, L. (2020). Por um feminismo afro-latino-americano. Editora Schwarcz-Companhia das Letras.
Haelewaters, D., Hofmann, T. A., & Romero-Olivares, A. L. (2021). Ten simple rules for Global North researchers to stop perpetuating helicopter research in the Global South. PLoS Computational Biology, 17(8). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009277
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2024). Conde. Available: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/ba/conde/panorama. Accessed: 04/04/2024.
Krenak, A (2020) A vida não é útil. Ed. Companhia das letras.
Ludwig, D., & Boogaard, B. K. (2021). Making transdisciplinarity work: An epistemology of inclusive development and innovation. In: The politics of knowledge in inclusive development and innovation (pp. 19–33). Routledge.
Ludwig, D., & El-Hani, C. N. (2020). Philosophy of Ethnobiology: Understanding Knowledge Integration and Its Limitations. Journal of Ethnobiology, 40(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-40.1.3
Musante, K., & DeWalt, B. R. (2010). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. Rowman Altamira.
Pearson, K. R., Backman, M., Grenni, S., Moriggi, A., Pisters, S. & Vrieze de, A. (2018). Arts-Based Methods for Transformative Engagement: A Toolkit. SUSPLACE Innovation Training Network: Wageningen, Netherlands. (Online – open access). https://doi.org/10.18174/441523
Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002
Poster, W., Crain, M. & Cherry, M. (2016). 1. Introduction: Conceptualizing Invisible Labor. In M. Crain, W. Poster & M. Cherry (Ed.), Invisible Labor: Hidden Work in the Contemporary World (pp. 3-27). Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520961630-003
Punch, S. (2012) Hidden struggles of fieldwork: exploring the role and use of field diaries. Emotion, Space and Society, 5(2), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2010.09.005
Rowe, A. M. C. (2005). Be longing: toward a feminist politics of relation. NWSA Journal 17(2), 15-46.
Scholz, R.W., Steiner, G. (2015) Transdisciplinarity at the crossroads. Sustainability Science 10, 521-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0338-0
Smith, L., Bratini, L., Chambers, D. A., Jensen, R. V., & Romero, L. (2010). Between idealism and reality: Meeting the challenges of participatory action research. Action Research, 8(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750310366043
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gabriela De La Rosa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in this journal remains the property of the authors. For liability reasons, the title belongs to the Foundation for the Support of the Knowledge Management for Development Journal. The journal is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License. This journal is currently an open access journal as it has a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition [1] of "open access", we support the rights of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles." However, some of the content (2009-2012) is only available on the Taylor and Francis website. Within the next few months, this issue too will become available on the OJS. [1] http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess