Epistemic injustice in international development: the case study of a research institute’s knowledge strategy
Keywords:epistemic justice, decolonization, research institute, knowledge, international development cooperation
In the past years, the presence, and consequences of epistemic injustice – unfair treatment of individuals and groups in knowledge and communication practices – has become a topic of concern and debate for actors in the field of research and international development. This debate is rightly a topic of concern for Wageningen Centre for Development Innovation (WCDI), part of Wageningen University and Research (WUR), the Netherlands. WCDI operates as a research institute in the field of international development. As a research institute, it is having a significant influence in the realm knowledge creation, knowledge use and education for professionals and institutions in its target groups and individuals. This case study shows how the concept of epistemic justice can be made concrete and actionable. In addition, it also critically reflects on the current practices and policies that reinforce epistemic injustice. This is done by using an epistemic justice lens to review the current strategy of WCDI to position itself as a “knowledge partner” in the field of international development. This was done by interviewing individuals within the organization, and by reviewing organizational and policy documents, and academic literature. Epistemic injustice remains largely ignored as a dimension of discrimination in research, knowledge development and programme implementation. This paper concludes that the strategy development process can be a key tool for tackling epistemic injustice in knowledge and practices, by institutions and individuals in international development.
Andrea M Vásquez-Fernández, Cash Ahenakew pii tai poo taa (2020), Resurgence of relationality: reflections on decolonizing and indigenizing ‘sustainable development.’ Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 43: 65-70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.03.005.
Boogaard, B. K. (2021) Epistemic injustice in agricultural development: Critical reflections on a livestock development project in rural Mozambique. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 16, 28-54. https://www.km4djournal.org/index.php/km4dj/article/view/475/630
Boyes, B., J. Chavez-Tafur, S. Cummings, P. Dewah, C. Dhewa, G. Kemboi, S. Harish, A. Hendrix-Jenkins, D. Ludwig, R. Sanz, T.A. Senaji, D. Senmartin, and S. Young (2022) Call for papers: Uncomfortable truths in international development, https://realkm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Call_for_Papers_KM4D_Journal_Decolonization_of_Knowledge_2022-04.pdf.
Bruggeman, H. (2022) MT update June 30th. Internal presentation. Wageningen: WCDI.
Cummings, S., & Hoebink, P. (2017) Representation of academics from developing countries as authors and editorial board members in scientific journals: Does this matter to the field of development studies? European Journal of Development Research, 29(2): 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41287-016- 0002-2/FIGURES/3.
Cummings, S., Dhewa, C., Kemboi, G., & Young, S. (2023). Doing epistemic justice in sustainable development: Applying the philosophical concept of epistemic injustice to the real world. Sustainable Development, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2497
Degaga, T. S., Weston, S., Tego, T. T., Abate, D. T., Aseffa, A., Wayessa, A., Price, R. N., Hailu, A., & Thriemer, K. (2020). Disseminating clinical study results to trial participants in Ethiopia: Insights and lessons learned. Malaria Journal, 19(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12936-020-03279-5/FIGURES/1
Bhambra; G.K. (2021) Decolonizing Critical Theory?: Epistemological justice, progress, reparations. Critical Times 4 (1): 73-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-8855227
Kidd, I. J., Medina, J., & Pohlhaus, G. jr. (2019). The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice. https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Handbook-of-Epistemic-Injustice/Kidd-Medina-Pohlhaus- Jr/p/book/9780367370633
Fricker, Miranda, (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing (Oxford, 2007; online edn, Oxford Academic https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001.
Guijt, J. (2021). WCDI Knowledge ambitions and agenda. Internal document
Koch, S. (2020). “The local consultant will not be credible”: how epistemic injustice is experienced and practised in development aid. Social Epistemology, 34(5), 478–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2020.1737749
Kurtulmus, F. (2020) The epistemic basic structure. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 37(5), 818-835. https://doi.org/10.1111/JAPP.12451
Liverpool, L. (2021) Researchers from global South under-represented in development research. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/D41586-021-02549-9
Muschik, E. (2022) Special issue introduction: Towards a global history of international organizations and decolonization. Journal of Global History, 17(2), 173-190. doi:10.1017/S1740022822000043,https://cup.org/3LPMFZa
Ocharan,J, Petrova, V, and Guijt, I (2021) Chapter 14: The urgency for epistemic and political climate justice, Knowledge For The Anthropocene. Edited by Francisco J. Carrillo and Günter Koch, Print ISBN: 9781800884281, 416, Geography, Planning and Tourism
Parker, M. (2013) The ethics of open access publishing. BMC Medical Ethics, 14(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-16/COMMENTS
Taylor, J. (2019) Reporting research findings to participants is an ethical imperative. BMJ, 367. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.L6324
Walker, M. (2019) Why epistemic justice matters in and for education. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 20, 161-170 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09601-4
WCDI. (n.d.-a) Document A business model canvas executive summary. Internal document.
WCDI (n.d.-b) Kwartaalreportage Q2 2022. Internal document.
WCDI (n.d.-c) Last-mile knowledge products: application criteria 2022. Internal document.
WCDI (n.d.-d) Last-mile knowledge products – 1st batch 2022. Internal document.
World Medical Association (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2013.281053.
WUR (n.d.-a) About Wageningen Centre for Development Innovation. Reviewed May 1, 2023 from https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/research-institutes/centre-for-development-innovation/about-us.htm.
WUR (n.d.-b) About Wageningen University & Research. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://www.wur.nl/en/about-wur.htm.
WUR (n.d.-c) Hierarchical structure - Intranet WUR. Retrieved December 2, 2022, from https://intranet.wur.nl/umbraco/en/about-wur/hierarchical-structure/.
Copyright (c) 2023 Julia Glaser, Eunice Amboka Likoko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.The copyright of the articles published in this journal remains the property of the authors. For liability reasons, the title belongs to the Foundation for the Support of the Knowledge Management for Development Journal. The journal is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License. This journal is currently an open access journal as it has a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition  of "open access", we support the rights of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles." However, some of the content (2009-2012) is only available on the Taylor and Francis website. Within the next few months, this issue too will become available on the OJS.  http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess