Knowledge management for sustainable development in the web 2.0 era: the Triangle of Dichotomies

  • Alexander Voccia United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs
Keywords: web 2.0, knowledge management, sustinable development

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework that will support the international development community in its efforts to establish web-based knowledge management platforms that maximise the opportunities offered by the recent surge of web 2.0 technologies. In order to develop such a framework, the paper reviews the key concepts that define knowledge management practices, and attempts to understand the constraints that currently limit the application of these practices in the development sector, as well as the emerging opportunities offered by the growth of web 2.0 technologies. The result of this effort has been the establishment of the Triangle of Dichotomies. By moulding the strengths of web 2.0 technologies to the uniqueness of the development sector, the Triangle of Dichotomies offers development practitioners a lens to assess strengths, weaknesses and latent opportunities of web-based knowledge management structures according to specific user needs and contextual particularities. You can't manage knowledge – nobody can. What you can do is to manage the environment in which knowledge can be created, discovered, captured, shared, distilled, validated, transferred, adopted, adapted and applied. (Collins and Parcell 2007).

References

Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E., 2001. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25 (1), 107–136 [online]. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3250961 [Accessed 12 March 2009].
Allen, T.J. 1977. Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technology information within the RandD orgaisation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Argote, L., Beckman, S.L., and Epple, D. 1990. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Science, 36 (2), 140–154.
Bukowitz, W. and Williams, R., 2001. Knowledge management fieldbook. Business digest, February 2001 [online]. Available from: http://www.englishimpact.com.mx/People_commitment/
Knowledge%20Management.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2009]
Cacioppo, J.T., Perry, R.E., and Kao, C.E. 1984. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307 [online]. Available from: http://psychology.
uchicago.edu/people/faculty/cacioppo/jtcreprints/cpk84.pdf [Accessed 3 June 2009].
Collison, C. and Parcell, G., 2007. Learning to fly: practical knowledge management from leading and learning orgaisations. New Delhi: Wiley India.
Creech, H. and Willard, T., 2001. Strategic intentions: managing knowledge networks for sustainable development [online]. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Available from: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2001/networks_strategic_intentions.pdf [Accessed 30 March 2009].
Daugherty, T., Eastin M., and Gangadharbatla, H., 2005. e-CRM: understanding Internet confidence and implications for customer relationship management. Online Encyclopedia [online].
Available from: http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/articles/pages/6410/eCRM-Understanding-Internet-Confidence-and-the-Implications-for-Customer-Relationship-Management.html
[Accessed 3 June 2009].
Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. 1998. Working knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Deci, E.L. and Flaste, R. 1995. Why we do what we do: the dynamics of personal autonomy. New York: Putnam.
Dretske, F.I. 1999. Knowledge and the flow of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Engeström, Y. 1999. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In: Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, R.L. Punamaki, eds. Perspectives on activity theory Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 19–38.
Gupta, A. and Govindarajan, V., 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (4), 473–496.
Gupta, A. and McDaniel, J., 2002. Creating competitive advantage by effectively managing knowledge: a framework for knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 3 [online] Available from: http://www.tlainc.com/articl39.htm [Accessed 31 March 2009].
Henderson, K., 2005. The knowledge sharing approach of the United Nations Development Programme. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 1 (2) 19–30 [online]. Available
from: http://journal.km4dev.org/index.php/km4dj/article/viewFile/21/17 [Accessed 29 March 2009].
Holtham, C. and Courtney, N. 1998. The executive learning ladder: a knowledge creation process grounded in the strategic information systems domain. In: E. Hoadley and I. Benbesat,
ed. Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Baltimore, MD: London School of Ecnomics, 594–597. Available from: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/
informationSystems/resourcesAndLinks/ACIS.htm [Accessed 15 July 2009].
Hulsebosch, J., Marcilly, B., and Schaeffers, L., 2006. Uniting through networks: the art of fostering ICT for development (ICT4D) networks. KM4D Journal, 2 (2), 33–47.
Ibarra, H. 1995. Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (3), 673–703 [online]. Available from: http://www.
jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/256742.pdf [Accessed 28 May 2009].
Kampa, J., 2007. Web2.0 supported rural communities: a case study from Portugal. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 3 (1), 35–48 [online]. Available
from: http://www.km4dev.org/journal/index.php/km4dj/article/viewFile/95/162 [Accessed 29 March 2009].
Kishore, A., 2007. The new content ecosystem: resistance is FATAL! Internet Evolution [online]. Available from: http://www.internetevolution.com/document.asp?doc_id=134901andprint=
yes [Accessed 3 June 2009].
Leonard, D. and Senspier, S. 1998. The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40 (3), 112–131.
Matsuura, K., 2005. Towards knowledge societies. Elearningeuropa.info [online]. [Accessed 9 November 2010].
Majchrzak, A., Cooper, L.P., and Neece, O.E., 2004. Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Science, 50 (2), 174–188.
Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of orgaisational knowledge creation. Orgaisation Science, 5 (1), 14–37.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Connor, G.C. and Dermott, C.M., 2004. The human side of radical innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21 (1), 11–30.
Osterloh, M. and Frey, B.S., 2000. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organizational Science, 11 (5), 538–550 [online]. Available from: http://www.jstor.
org/stable/2640344 [Accessed 31 March 2009].
Peña-López, I., 2007. The personal research portal: web 2.0 driven individual commitment with open access for development. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 3 (1), 35–48.
Phillips, K.W., Mannix, E.A., Neale, M.A., and Gruenfeld, D.H., 2003. Diverse groups and information sharing: the effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (4),
497–510.
Safard, A. 1998. On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27 (2), 4–13.
Schoorman, F.D., Mayer, R.C., and Davis, J.H., 2007. An integrative model of orgaisational trust: past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32 (2) [online]. Available from:
http://catta.labcc.ch/tesi/Mayer_et_Al-2007.pdf [Accessed 29 May 2009].
Senge, P.M., 2006. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Soeftestad, L., 2001. Aligning needs and means. On culture, ICT and knowledge in development cooperation. CBNRM Net Papers, 2 [online]. Available from: http://www.cbnrm.net/
pdf/soeftestad_l_002_iris2001.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2009].
Szulanski, G., 2000. The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness. Orgaisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82 (1), 9–27.
The Oxford English Dictionary, 1989. OED Online. Oxford University Press [online]. Available from: http://www.oed.com/ [Accessed 28 May 2009].
Thomas-Hunt, M.C., Ogden, T.Y., and Neale, M.A., 2003. Who’s really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Science, 49 (4), 464–477 [online]. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4133951 [Accessed 31 March 2009].
UNESCO, 2005. Towards knowledge societies. Paris: UNESCO Publishing [online]. Available from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001418/141843e.pdf [Accessed 1 June 2009].
United Nations, 2004. Information and communication technologies for development: progress in the implementation of General Assembly resolution 57/295. United Nations General Assembly, fifty-ninth session, agenda item 44, A/59/563 [online]. Available from: http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/601/31/PDF/N0460131.pdf?OpenElement [Accessed 29
March 2009].
United Nations, 2006. Report of the Office of Internal Oversight Services on the thematic evaluation of knowledge management networks in the pursuit of the goals of the Millennium Declaration. Committee for Programme and Coordination, forty-sixth session, New York. E/AC.51/2006/1.
United Nations, 2007. Knowledge Management in the United Nations System. Joint Inspection Unit, Switzerland, Geneva. JIU/REP/2007/6.
United Nations, 2009. Mapping Media Education Policies in the World. New York: United Nations-Alliance of Civilizations.
Van Doodewaard, M., 2006. Online knowledge sharing tools: any use in Africa? Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 2 (3), 40–47.
Williamson, O. 1993. Calculativeness, trust, and economic orgaisation. Journal of Law and Economics, 36 (1), 453–486.
Published
2019-08-16
Section
Papers