Mapping networks to improve knowledge exchange among family planning and reproductive health organizations in Ethiopia
Keywords:networks, reproductive health, network mapping, knowledge mapping, family planning, social knowledge management, Ethiopia
AbstractEthiopia’s fertility rate is 4.8 and maternal mortality ratio is 673/100,000. These poor family planning/reproductive health (FP/RH) indicators are due in part to inadequate systems for Social Knowledge Management (SKM). The Knowledge for Health Project conducted qualitative research to identify: 1) key FP/RH actors; 2) SKM barriers/facilitators; and 3) opportunities to leverage networks and resources to improve uptake of evidence and best practices. Researchers conducted Network-Mapping exercises, interviews, and focus group discussions among 41 national, regional, and zonal/woreda stakeholders in Ethiopia. Participants identified FP/RH actors, and discussed each actor’s relative influence and role in enabling/impeding knowledge exchange. They assessed health information needs and challenges, and made recommendations for improvement. Over 100 actors were identified. The Ministry of Health is central to information flow, and new knowledge often diffuses slowly to others. Needs differ by level: National-level professionals need policy and strategy documents, while regional- and community-level professionals request contextualized information. This innovative, participatory methodology facilitated a thorough examination of Ethiopia’s FP/RH knowledge exchange network and allowed stakeholders to make recommendations for strengthening SKM systems and programs. These suggestions included: supporting FP/RH networks, developing a central FP/RH repository, tailoring resources to the local context, and preventing bottlenecks created by information gatekeepers.
The copyright of the articles published in this journal remains the property of the authors. For liability reasons, the title belongs to the Foundation for the Support of the Knowledge Management for Development Journal. The journal is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License. This journal is currently an open access journal as it has a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition  of "open access", we support the rights of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles." However, some of the content (2009-2012) is only available on the Taylor and Francis website. Within the next few months, this issue too will become available on the OJS.  http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess